Skip to main content

Leaving Coercive Control: A Testimony, Three Years On

Gildas GarrecCBT Psychotherapist
6 min read

💬 Analyse your conversations — Are you going through this situation? Upload your WhatsApp messages for an objective, confidential psychological analysis of your relationship.

TL;DR : This testimony is a representative, anonymized account — a composite synthesis of frequently observed journeys, not the story of an identifiable person. It retraces, three years on, the typical stages of leaving coercive control: initial denial, gradual erosion, the wake-up call, the difficult departure, the hoovering, then the long rebuilding. The aim isn't to dramatize, but to put words to an experience many live in silence, and to show that you do come out of it. At each stage, a clinical note links the lived experience to known mechanisms. If you recognize yourself and are in distress, resources exist: a healthcare professional, or a helpline suited to your country via findahelpline.com.

Leaving Coercive Control: A Testimony, Three Years On

Note: out of respect for those concerned, this account is a composite, anonymized testimony. It describes no real, identifiable person, but gathers recurring elements observed in clinical practice. The mechanisms, however, are faithful to what many people live.
"Three years. It took me three years to feel like myself again. And even now, I sometimes discover cracks I didn't suspect." That's how many accounts of leaving coercive control begin. Here is one, reconstructed — so that those living it know they're neither alone nor crazy.

The beginning: "everything was perfect"

"At first, he was the most attentive man in the world. He wrote to me constantly, wanted to know everything, said he'd never felt this. I felt unique." Clinical note: this intense phase — love bombing — isn't excessive love, it's accelerated dependency-building. The initial idealization creates a reference point ("the dream of the beginning") that will later be used to keep the person in place ("he can become like before again").

The erosion: "I no longer knew if I was exaggerating"

"Little by little, there were remarks. About my friends, my clothes, the way I spoke. Always wrapped up: 'it's for your own good.' When I protested, I was 'too sensitive.' I started keeping quiet for some peace." Clinical note: coercive control sets in through slow erosion, a mix of put-downs and gaslighting. The person internalizes the criticism, doubts their perception, and self-censors. Progressive isolation cuts off the outside perspectives that could raise the alarm.

The silence and the returns: "I walked on eggshells"

"When something displeased him, he didn't shout. He went silent, sometimes three days. It was unbearable. I always ended up apologizing, even without knowing what for. Then he'd become adorable again, and I'd tell myself I'd imagined it all." Clinical note: the silent treatment alternated with warm phases creates intermittent reinforcement. It's this contrast that forges the trauma bond: you cling all the harder because the warmth is unpredictable.

The wake-up call: "it's not an argument, it's a system"

"The wake-up call came from a friend. She said one simple sentence: 'You apologize all the time, even when it's not your fault.' It hit me like a slap. I started writing things down, just for myself. And re-reading them, I saw the pattern." Clinical note: the wake-up call often comes from an outside perspective or from putting things into facts. Seeing the pattern repeat in black and white breaks the perceptual isolation: you move from "maybe it's me" to "there's a mechanism." It's a decisive turning point.

The departure: "the hardest part wasn't leaving"

"Leaving wasn't the hardest. The hardest was holding on. He wrote me magnificent messages, then threatening ones, then desperate ones. Mutual friends told me I was cruel, that he was doing badly. I nearly went back ten times." Clinical note: the departure triggers hoovering (attempts to reclaim) and sometimes the flying monkeys (the entourage mobilized). No contact, here, isn't harshness: it's a condition of psychological survival. Each renewed contact resets the counter.

The rebuilding: "relearning to exist"

"The first year, I was kind of numb. I no longer knew what I liked. I started again with tiny things: choosing a film without asking anyone's opinion, seeing my friends again, taking up dance. I saw a psychologist. Slowly, I found myself again." Clinical note: rebuilding self-esteem goes through reconnecting with one's own needs, the double grief (the relationship and the hope), self-compassion, and support. It isn't linear: relapses into doubt are normal and don't signal failure.

Three years on: "I didn't become who I was before"

"I didn't become who I was before. I became someone else — more clear-sighted, more attuned to myself, less willing to lose myself to be loved. I now recognize the signals very early. What I lived, I wish on no one. But I know you come out of it." Clinical note: many describe post-traumatic growth: not a return to the prior state, but a transformation. The vigilance acquired is protective, provided it doesn't freeze into generalized distrust — hence the value of support to integrate the experience without shutting down.

What this account teaches us

  • Coercive control sets in gradually; you don't "consent" to it, you're conditioned into it.
  • The wake-up call often comes from a fact or a third party that breaks the perceptual isolation.
  • The departure isn't the end of the fight: no contact and managing hoovering are what follow.
  • Rebuilding is long, non-linear, and very real.
  • Getting support speeds up and secures the process.

Re-reading to believe yourself

Many, as in this account, had their wake-up call by re-reading their own exchanges and seeing the pattern repeat. When doubt returns — "did I exaggerate?" — returning to the real conversations restores the facts and validates what you lived. This return to reality isn't rumination: it's a way of giving your perception back the trust coercive control had taken from it.

Takeaway: This composite testimony illustrates a common journey — love bombing, erosion, punishing silence, wake-up call, departure, hoovering, rebuilding — and shows one essential thing: you do come out of coercive control. The way out isn't a step backward but a transformation. If you recognize yourself and are suffering, you're neither alone nor "crazy": a healthcare professional or a helpline (via findahelpline.com) can support you, at your own pace.
📖
Lire sur Psycho-Tests

Retrouvez cet article sur le site principal avec des ressources complementaires.

Need clarity before deciding?

Analyse your conversation for free on ScanMyLove.

Free dashboard — Essential Report free

Start free analysis

AND YOU?

Where do you stand? Take the test: Manipulation Detector

Take the test →

Besoin d'un accompagnement personnalisé ?

Gildas Garrec, Psychopraticien TCC — Séances en visioséance (90€ / 75 min) ou en cabinet à Nantes.

Prendre RDV en visioséance →
🧠
Discover our 14 clinical psychology models

Gottman, Young, Attachment, Beck, Sternberg, Chapman, NVC and 7 other models applied to your conversations.

Partager cet article :

Gildas Garrec, Psychopraticien TCC

About the author

Gildas Garrec · CBT Psychopractitioner

Certified practitioner in cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), author of 16 books on applied psychology and relationships. Over 900 clinical articles published across Psychologie et Sérénité.

📚 16 published books📝 900+ articles🎓 CBT certified
Leaving Coercive Control: A Testimony, Three Years On | Analyse de Conversation - ScanMyLove